MedicineWorld.Org
Your gateway to the world of medicine
Home
News
Cancer News
About Us
Cancer
Health Professionals
Patients and public
Contact Us
Disclaimer

Medicineworld.org: FDA Approves Avastin For Second Line Treatment Of Colon Cancer

Back to colon cancer blog Blogs list Cancer blog  


Subscribe To Colon Cancer Blog RSS Feed  RSS content feed What is RSS feed?

Fda Approves Avastin For Second Line Treatment Of Colon Cancer

FDA Approves Avastin For Second Line Treatment Of Colon Cancer

On June 20, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval for a labeling extension for bevacizumab (Avastin®, Genentech), administered in combination with intravenous 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, for the second-line therapy of metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum. This recommendation is based on the demonstration of a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) in patients receiving Avastin® plus FOLFOX4 (5-flourouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) when compared to those receiving FOLFOX4 alone.

The trial (E3200) supporting this approval was an open label, randomized, 3-arm, active-controlled, multi-center clinical trial evaluating AVASTIN® alone (n=244), AVASTIN® plus FOLFOX4 (n=293), and FOLFOX4 alone (n=292). Following a planned interim analysis, the AVASTIN® monotherapy arm was closed to accrual based on evidence of decreased survival in patients treated with AVASTIN® alone compared with FOLFOX4 alone. Patients entered on the trial had progressive or recurrent disease following previous 5-FU and irinotecan-based treatment. Patients (99%) received irinotecan with or without 5-FU as initial treatment for metastatic disease; those who received adjuvant irinotecan-based chemotherapy were mandatory to have recurred within 6 months of completing treatment.

In both the combination and monotherapy arms, AVASTIN® was administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The FOLFOX4 regimen, administered every 2 weeks, consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and leucovorin 200 mg/m2 administered concurrently as an intravenous infusion, then 5 FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus followed by 5 FU 600 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion on day 1. On day 2, patients received leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV, then 5 FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus followed by 5 FU 600 mg/m2 continuous intravenous infusion. When given in combination with FOLFOX4, AVASTIN® was administered on day 1 previous to oxaliplatin and leucovorin.

Among the 829 randomized patients, the median age was 61 years and 49% had an ECOG performance status of 0. Twenty-six percent had received previous radiation treatment, 80% received previous adjuvant chemotherapy, and all received previous irinotecan treatment.

Overall survival, the trial's primary endpoint, was significantly longer in patients receiving AVASTIN® in combination with FOLFOX 4 as compared to those receiving FOLFOX4 alone (median OS 13.0 mos vs. 10.8 mos; hazard ratio 0.75, p=0.001 stratified log rank test). The survival benefit was also observed in subgroups defined by age (<65 vs. >65 yrs) and gender. Patients treated with the AVASTIN® combination were reported by investigator assessment to have significantly longer progression-free survival and higher overall response rate.

The most serious, and sometimes fatal, AVASTIN® toxicities are gastrointestinal perforation, wound healing complications, hemorrhage, arterial thromboembolic events, hypertensive crisis, nephrotic syndrome and congestive heart failure. The most common adverse events in patients receiving AVASTIN® are asthenia, pain, abdominal pain, headache, hypertension, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, stomatitis, constipation, upper respiratory infection, epistaxis, dyspnea, exfoliative dermatitis, and proteinuria.

In Trial E3200, data were collected only for NCI-CTC grade 3-5 adverse events. Therefore, these data are likely to under-estimate the true adverse event rates. In addition, neither the time of onset nor the time to resolution of adverse events were collected. NCI-CTC grade 3-5 adverse events that were more common in patients receiving the AVASTIN® compared to FOLFOX4 alone were fatigue (19% vs. 13%), diarrhea (18% vs. 13%), sensory neuropathy (17% vs. 9%), nausea (12% vs. 5%), vomiting (11% vs. 4%), dehydration (10% vs. 5%), high blood pressure (9% vs. 2%), abdominal pain (8% vs. 5%), hemorrhage (5% vs. 1%), other neurologic toxicities (5% vs. 3%), ileus (4% vs. 1%), and headache (3% vs. 0).

Fatal, therapy-related adverse events in patients receiving AVASTIN® in this study included CNS hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal perforation with sepsis.



Posted by: Sue    Source




Did you know?
On June 20, 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted approval for a labeling extension for bevacizumab (Avastinandreg;, Genentech), administered in combination with intravenous 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, for the second-line therapy of metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum. This recommendation is based on the demonstration of a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS) in patients receiving Avastinandreg; plus FOLFOX4 (5-flourouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) when compared to those receiving FOLFOX4 alone.

Medicineworld.org: FDA Approves Avastin For Second Line Treatment Of Colon Cancer

Main Page| Cancer blog| Cancer blogs list| Lung cancer blog| Colon cancer blog| Prostate cancer blog| Breast cancer blog| Diabetes watch blog| Heart watch blog| Allergy blog| Bladder cancer blog| Cervical cancer blog| Colon cancer news blog| Diabetes news blog| Esophageal cancer blog| Gastric cancer blog| Health news blog| Heart news blog| Infectious disease blog| Kidney watch blog| Lung disease blog| Lung cancer news blog| Mesothelioma blog| Neurology blog| Breast cancer news blog| OBGYN blog| Ophthalmology blog| Ovarian cancer blog| Cancer news blog| Pancreas cancer blog| Pediatrics blog| Prostate cancer news blog| Psychology blog| Research blog| Rheumatology blog| Society news blog| Uterine cancer blog| Weight watch blog|

Copyright statement
The contents of this web page are protected. Legal action may follow for reproduction of materials without permission.